Fast file site
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.
You need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you have to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.
There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...
There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little usage of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.
p2p순위 The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.